Energy Efficiency Measures
COMMERCIAL: LIGHTING
High-efficiency lamps, such as T-5 and T-8 fluorescent
lamps with electronic ballasts, provide the same or improved
illumination as do fixtures with T-12 lamps and magnetic ballasts.
Combined with de-lamping and high-efficiency reflectors, retrofit
savings can approach a factor of two. Depending on usage patterns,
installation costs, and other factors, paybacks for many lighting
retrofits are often three years or less. Additional benefits of
energy-efficient lighting include lowered cooling costs since less
waste heat must be removed by the air conditioning system.
A wide range of compact fluorescent lighting (CFL) fixtures are
now available whose characteristics are far superior to earlier
models. Modern versions typically have zero hum, long-life electronic
ballasts, excellent color rendering, are four times more efficient
than incandescents, a lifetime of up to 10,000 hours, and bulk prices
of less than $3 apiece. Since a CFL outlasts a typical incandescent
by a factor of 10 or more, their upfront costs are now about the
same. Lifetime savings of a 25-watt CFL over a 100-watt incandescent
is 750 kWh - and maintenance costs are reduced as well. The ENERGY
STAR program lists over 1,400 CFL bulbs that are "qualified" as
high-performance by their criteria (which include lifetime, efficiency,
and surface temperature limits), as well as about 10 percent of
that number that have been deemed "unqualified." These are shown
by manufacturer and model number at
www.energystar.gov/ia/products/prod_lists/cfl_prod_list.pdf.
Light emitting diodes (LEDs) last a long time (ten years
or more) and are quite energy efficient. Accordingly, they are ideal
for use in exit signs. Since exit signs operate for 8,766 hours
in an average year, efficiency improvements can result in substantial
savings. Old-style exit signs used 40 watts of power and bulbs had
to be replaced often. ENERGY STAR qualified exit signs use less
than five watts per face; over 500 that meet this criterion are
listed at
www.energystar.gov/ia/products/prod_lists/exit_signs_prod_list.pdf.
In general, lighting distribution is more efficient and visually
comfortable in light-colored spaces, especially those in
which the ceilings are white. This applies across a wide range of
buildings from chicken coops and schools to offices and industrial
facilities. In each of these cases, lighting quality improvements
by the addition of white paint are frequently accompanied by improved
productivity.
Whenever feasible, retrofit lighting design strategies should
be combined with daylighting controls to maximize energy
efficiency. Such controls may locate a sensor outside to measure
the amount of light entering spaces through windows or skylights,
or be placed above the work plane to dim electric lights in response
to the amount of natural light falling on key surfaces. Furthermore,
a task/ambient lighting design strategy that provides an appropriate
level of general light and task-level light where it is needed reduces
the overall electricity load required for lighting. Good designs
also enhance working and learning environments.
The ability to control the daylight entering a building
is critical to a daylighting design's success. Studies show that
school classrooms with skylights designed with manually-operated
internal louvers result in a dramatic increase in student performance.
At the same time, it is important to minimize glare caused by uncontrolled
daylighting. Daylight tends to penetrate from a window into an interior
space about 1.5 times the head height of the window. Light shelves
and similar devices reflect natural light onto white-colored ceilings,
which both controls for glare and allows diffuse light to illuminate
the interior space. For such spaces, it's best to install dimmable
light fixtures and associated daylighting controls.
Older industrial facilities often incorporate rooftop windows,
either vertical or at an angle to the vertical, in a saw-tooth fashion.
Sometimes these windows can be opened to enhance ventilation, but
their main function is to supply natural light. Oftentimes, they
perform this function too well, allowing direct beam sunlight to
fall on work spaces below where they cause unwanted glare and produce
harsh shadows. One solution is to redirect sunlight up on a light-colored
ceiling as illustrated below.
This
system uses specular reflectors which can become dusty unless cleaned
regularly. A simple way to accomplish this task is to install several
copper tubes with holes in them that will direct a blast of compressed
air over the reflective surfaces for several seconds at the close
of production each day. Enhancements include using specularly-selective
glazing to provide adequate daylight with relatively low solar heat
gain and installing insulating shutters to limit thermal losses
through the roof windows on cold winter nights. In all cases, energy-efficient
electric lighting should be controllable so that it can be ramped
up as needed when solar daylighting is diminished by cloud cover
or for night-time lighting needs.
Occupancy sensors are electronic devices that detect the
presence of people. They turn on lights or associated equipment
such as computer monitors or copiers when people are detected, and
turn things off if no people are detected after a programmable period
of time, typically 5 to 15 minutes. Their sensitivities and areas
of coverage may be adjusted to a degree, dependent upon on the technology
used by the sensor, its location, and control settings.
|

Dual technology occupancy sensor (Source: Watt Stopper)
|
Ultrasonic sensors are quite sensitive and react to small motions.
They are sensitive over large areas, but are subject to false triggering.
Passive infrared sensors are less susceptible to false triggering,
but their sensitivity drops off with the square of the distance.
Some dual technology systems are available that incorporate the
virtues of both technologies, but they are somewhat more expensive.
In general, ultrasonic occupancy sensors are best used in large
areas, infrared in smaller areas.
Mounting occupancy sensors toward the tops of walls is best for
smaller spaces like offices, copy rooms, and bathrooms. Ceiling-mounted
sensors are best for larger open spaces.
In recent years, the quality and performance of occupancy sensors
has become higher while costs have come down. Accordingly, for many
applications they can save substantial energy and are quite cost-effective.
The trick is to match the right sensor to the right circumstance
to maximize energy saving performance while minimizing people hassle
and cost. This is a judgment call that is a strong function of the
patterns of the people that are using a given space. This is why
potential energy savings for various kinds of spaces has such a
broad range, as illustrated in the following table.
Range of savings from the use of occupancy sensors
| Type of Space |
Range of energy savings (%) |
| Private office |
13 - 50
|
| Open-plan office |
20 - 28
|
| Classroom |
40 - 46
|
| Conference room |
22 - 65
|
| Corridors |
30 - 80
|
| Storage areas, closets |
45 - 80
|
Occupancy controls are also quite useful in hotels and motels
where they permit thermostat adjustments on the heating and cooling
system as a function of occupancy. For additional information, visit
www.ladwp.com/energyadvisor/PA_10.html.
Efficient parking lot lighting fixtures can reduce the
energy use on the site without compromising safety or illumination.
"Hockey puck" fixtures, which use 175-watt metal halide bulbs, require
fewer poles, cut down on light pollution, have better color rendering,
and use 70% less electricity than "cobra head" fixtures using 250-watt
high-pressure sodium bulbs.

Source: Clayton Engineering
Use timers and daylight sensors and controls in parking lots.
|