Energy Efficiency Measures
COMMERCIAL: LIGHTING
High-efficiency lamps, such as T-5 and T-8 fluorescent lamps
with electronic ballasts, provide the same or improved illumination as do
fixtures with T-12 lamps and magnetic ballasts. Combined with de-lamping and
high-efficiency reflectors, retrofit savings can approach a factor of two.
Depending on usage patterns, installation costs, and other factors, paybacks for
many lighting retrofits are often three years or less. Additional benefits of
energy-efficient lighting include lowered cooling costs since less waste heat
must be removed by the air conditioning system.
A wide range of compact fluorescent lighting (CFL) fixtures are now available
whose characteristics are far superior to earlier models. Modern versions
typically have zero hum, long-life electronic ballasts, excellent color
rendering, are four times more efficient than incandescents, a lifetime of up to
10,000 hours, and bulk prices of less than $3 apiece. Since a CFL outlasts a
typical incandescent by a factor of 10 or more, their upfront costs are now
about the same. Lifetime savings of a 25-watt CFL over a 100-watt incandescent
is 750 kWh—and maintenance costs are reduced as well. The ENERGY STAR program
lists over 1,400 CFL bulbs that are “qualified” as high-performance by their
criteria (which include lifetime, efficiency, and surface temperature limits),
as well as about 10 percent of that number that have been deemed “unqualified.”
These are shown by manufacturer and model number at
www.energystar.gov/ia/products/prod_lists/cfl_prod_list.pdf.
Light emitting diodes (LEDs) last a long time (ten years or more) and
are quite energy efficient. Accordingly, they are ideal for use in exit signs.
Since exit signs operate for 8,766 hours in an average year, efficiency
improvements can result in substantial savings. Old-style exit signs used 40
watts of power and bulbs had to be replaced often. ENERGY STAR qualified exit
signs use less than five watts per face; over 500 that meet this criterion are
listed at
www.energystar.gov/ia/products/prod_lists/exit_signs_prod_list.pdf.
In general, lighting distribution is more efficient and visually comfortable
in light-colored spaces, especially those in which the ceilings are
white. This applies across a wide range of buildings from chicken coops and
schools to offices and industrial facilities. In each of these cases, lighting
quality improvements by the addition of white paint are frequently accompanied
by improved productivity.
Whenever feasible, retrofit lighting design strategies should be combined
with daylighting controls to maximize energy efficiency. Such controls
may locate a sensor outside to measure the amount of light entering spaces
through windows or skylights, or be placed above the work plane to dim electric
lights in response to the amount of natural light falling on key surfaces.
Furthermore, a task/ambient lighting design strategy that provides an
appropriate level of general light and task-level light where it is needed
reduces the overall electricity load required for lighting. Good designs also
enhance working and learning environments.
The ability to control the daylight entering a building is critical to
a daylighting design’s success. Studies show that school classrooms with
skylights designed with manually-operated internal louvers result in a dramatic
increase in student performance. At the same time, it is important to minimize
glare caused by uncontrolled daylighting. Daylight tends to penetrate from a
window into an interior space about 1.5 times the head height of the window.
Light shelves and similar devices reflect natural light onto white-colored
ceilings, which both controls for glare and allows diffuse light to illuminate
the interior space. For such spaces, it’s best to install dimmable light
fixtures and associated daylighting controls.
Older industrial facilities often incorporate rooftop windows, either
vertical or at an angle to the vertical, in a saw-tooth fashion. Sometimes these
windows can be opened to enhance ventilation, but their main function is to
supply natural light. Oftentimes, they perform this function too well, allowing
direct beam sunlight to fall on work spaces below where they cause unwanted
glare and produce harsh shadows. One solution is to redirect sunlight up on a
light-colored ceiling as illustrated below.
This
system uses specular reflectors which can become dusty unless cleaned regularly.
A simple way to accomplish this task is to install several copper tubes with
holes in them that will direct a blast of compressed air over the reflective
surfaces for several seconds at the close of production each day. Enhancements
include using specularly-selective glazing to provide adequate daylight with
relatively low solar heat gain and installing insulating shutters to limit
thermal losses through the roof windows on cold winter nights. In all cases,
energy-efficient electric lighting should be controllable so that it can be
ramped up as needed when solar daylighting is diminished by cloud cover or for
night-time lighting needs.
Occupancy sensors are electronic devices that detect the presence of
people. They turn on lights or associated equipment such as computer monitors or
copiers when people are detected, and turn things off if no people are detected
after a programmable period of time, typically 5 to 15 minutes. Their
sensitivities and areas of coverage may be adjusted to a degree, dependent upon
on the technology used by the sensor, its location, and control settings.
|

Dual technology occupancy sensor (Source: Watt Stopper) |
Ultrasonic sensors are quite sensitive and react to small motions. They are
sensitive over large areas, but are subject to false triggering. Passive
infrared sensors are less susceptible to false triggering, but their sensitivity
drops off with the square of the distance. Some dual technology systems are
available that incorporate the virtues of both technologies, but they are
somewhat more expensive. In general, ultrasonic occupancy sensors are best used
in large areas, infrared in smaller areas.
Mounting occupancy sensors toward the tops of walls is best for smaller
spaces like offices, copy rooms, and bathrooms. Ceiling-mounted sensors are best
for larger open spaces.
In recent years, the quality and performance of occupancy sensors has become
higher while costs have come down. Accordingly, for many applications they can
save substantial energy and are quite cost-effective. The trick is to match the
right sensor to the right circumstance to maximize energy saving performance
while minimizing people hassle and cost. This is a judgment call that is a
strong function of the patterns of the people that are using a given space. This
is why potential energy savings for various kinds of spaces has such a broad
range, as illustrated in the following table.
Range of savings from the use of occupancy sensors
| Type of Space |
Range of energy savings (%) |
| Private office |
13 - 50 |
| Open-plan office |
20 - 28 |
| Classroom |
40 - 46 |
| Conference room |
22 - 65 |
| Corridors |
30 - 80 |
| Storage areas, closets |
45 - 80 |
Occupancy controls are also quite useful in hotels and motels where they
permit thermostat adjustments on the heating and cooling system as a function of
occupancy. For additional information, visit
www.ladwp.com/energyadvisor/PA_10.html.
Efficient parking lot lighting fixtures can reduce the energy use on
the site without compromising safety or illumination. “Hockey puck” fixtures,
which use 175-watt metal halide bulbs, require fewer poles, cut down on light
pollution, have better color rendering, and use 70% less electricity than “cobra
head” fixtures using 250-watt high-pressure sodium bulbs.

Source: Clayton Engineering
Use timers and daylight sensors and controls in parking lots.
|